The Legal Framework on Bribery and Corruption: Main International Legislation

Bribery and corruption are pervasive issues that undermine economic development, erode public trust, and distort fair competition. The global community has responded with a variety of legal frameworks aimed at combating these practices. This article explores key legislations, international treaties, and agreements from major jurisdictions, highlighting their requirements and differences.

United Nations: Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC)

The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), adopted in 2003, is a comprehensive global framework aimed at preventing and combating corruption through a multifaceted approach. Key elements include:

1. Preventive Measures: States parties are required to implement policies promoting integrity, transparency, and accountability in both public and private sectors.
2. Criminalization and Law Enforcement: The convention mandates the criminalization of various corrupt acts, including bribery of national and foreign public officials, embezzlement, and money laundering.
3. International Cooperation: Emphasizes mutual legal assistance, extradition, and asset recovery, facilitating cooperation among states to tackle transnational corruption.
4. Asset Recovery: Introduces mechanisms for the recovery of assets obtained through corruption, requiring states to return stolen assets to their countries of origin.

UNCAC’s broad scope and emphasis on international collaboration make it a pivotal instrument in the global fight against corruption.

OECD: Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention is an international treaty that requires signatory countries to criminalize bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions. Key elements include:

1. Criminalization: Signatories must establish criminal offences for bribing foreign public officials.
2. Corporate Liability: Companies must be held liable for bribery offences committed by individuals acting on their behalf.
3. Enforcement: Signatories must provide mutual legal assistance and cooperate in the investigation and prosecution of bribery offences.

The OECD Convention mandates strong enforcement mechanisms and emphasizes transparency and accountability in business operations.

European Union: EU Anti-Corruption Legislation

The European Union has established a robust framework to combat corruption, focusing on both public and private sectors. Key instruments include:

1. Convention on the Fight Against Corruption Involving Officials: This convention, based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, criminalizes both active and passive corruption involving EU officials and national officials of member states.
2. Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA: This decision targets corruption in the private sector, requiring member states to criminalize both active and passive corruption in business activities and to ensure effective, proportionate, and dissuasive penalties.

The EU framework emphasizes cross-border cooperation among member states, harmonization of laws, and joint actions to tackle corruption effectively.

United States: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), enacted in 1977, is a cornerstone of the U.S. anti-corruption framework. It prohibits U.S. companies and individuals from bribing foreign officials to gain business advantages. The FCPA has two main provisions:

1. Anti-Bribery Provisions: These make it illegal to offer, pay, promise to pay, or authorize payment of money or anything of value to foreign officials to influence their actions.
2. Accounting Provisions: These require publicly traded companies to maintain accurate books and records and to have internal controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that transactions are executed and assets are managed properly.

A key aspect of the FCPA is its extraterritorial reach, covering any U.S. citizen, resident, or corporation, and even foreign companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges.

United Kingdom: Bribery Act 2010

The Bribery Act 2010 modernizes and consolidates bribery laws in the UK. It introduces comprehensive offences for both the public and private sectors, including:

1. General Offences: Covering the offering, promising, or giving of a bribe, and the requesting, agreeing to receive, or accepting of a bribe.
2. Bribery of Foreign Public Officials: Specifically addressing the bribery of foreign officials to obtain or retain business or an advantage in business.
3. Corporate Liability: Introducing a strict liability offence for commercial organizations that fail to prevent bribery by persons associated with them, unless the organization can show it had adequate procedures in place to prevent such conduct.

The Bribery Act is notable for its severe penalties, including up to 10 years imprisonment and unlimited fines, and its application to offences committed abroad by UK entities and nationals.

Key Differences in Requirements

While these frameworks share common goals, they exhibit key differences:

1. Scope of Prohibited Activities: The FCPA focuses primarily on bribery of foreign officials, whereas the Bribery Act 2010 covers both domestic and foreign bribery and includes private sector bribery.
2. Corporate Liability: The UK Bribery Act imposes strict liability on companies for failing to prevent bribery, requiring them to implement adequate procedures. The FCPA, while requiring internal controls, does not explicitly mandate preventive measures.
3. Penalties: Penalties under the Bribery Act can include unlimited fines and up to 10 years imprisonment, generally more severe than those under the FCPA.
4. Enforcement Mechanisms: The OECD Convention and EU framework emphasize international cooperation and mutual legal assistance, reflecting their multilateral nature, whereas the FCPA and Bribery Act focus on national enforcement with extraterritorial applications.

Conclusion

The global fight against bribery and corruption is supported by a diverse legal framework encompassing national laws, regional agreements, and international treaties. Each framework contributes unique strengths, from stringent corporate liability under the UK Bribery Act to the comprehensive anti-bribery measures of the OECD Convention. Understanding these differences is crucial for multinational corporations navigating the complex landscape of anti-corruption compliance. Through continued cooperation and robust enforcement, the international community strives to curb the pervasive threat of corruption.

Reach out to βrazan for risk management services, due diligence services, investigations and trainings for your staff related to bribery and corruption.